Noobs still continues to fail to adapt to it. Kind of like a real firefight, I suppose.Įmplacements are easy to counter. Only difference is you move inbetween cover and only stop to fire when you reach it. Flanking is still a thing, AoE will keep you mobile. Still doesn't mean you can just sit still during a fight. Without that RoF bonus they might as well just be more expensive grenadiers with some scaling.

It's what makes them better than grenadiers. The buff isn't so much a buff as a required thing for them to be good. Good players knowit's a bad idea and sucks because if you're up against someone of your own skill level they will know how to counter it by now.

Bad players use it, bad players can't counter it. When you're talking static british play you're also talking play on a low level. Sure you can play agressively with UKF with the right commander pick, but if you're always playing agressive you might as well go for USF and actually have a faction built around that philosophy. The fact that there's a advanced emplacement commander that's considered OP by some, the buff line infantry get for being garrisoned/in cover & bren that only fires when stationairy make it much more suitable for static gameplay then USF which has buffs on the move (albeit that UKF tanks still only have a 25% penalty on the move like USF, but there's talks of bringing that in line with other factions.) Ignore what poison ivan said, brits can be (and should be) mobile to be effective.īrits can be mobile, but it's not encouraged because it's not their strong side just like the graph on the store page shows. Originally posted by The Wombat of Combat:If you like arty for the love of god don't go brits.

Company of heroes 2 american vs british